Hubert & Mauss Sacrifice,
it's Nature and Function
Essai sur la Nature et la Funtion du Sacrifice
Translated
from the French, this essay is absolutely required reading.
Hubert
& Mauss say they have given themselves "only to the task of attempting
to put it (sacrifice) in its place."
(p103) Its ramifications in sociology, etc. are focused out
Discounting,
if not discarding, most Roman and European sources, although newer, in favor of
Biblical and Vedic material, Hubert and Mause say"(page 7) " The documents are direct, drawn up by the participants themselves, in their own language, in the very spirit in which they enacted the rights, " even if motives might have been unclear.
Roman and European For instance:
Hubert
& Mauss quote another author, Tyler, who they say was inspired by Bastian,
Spencer, and Darwin and I do not feel the thread can be improved upon:
"Sacrifice,
according to this writer, (Tyler, page 1) was originally a gift made by a primitive to supernatural being
with whom he needed to ingratiate himself. Then, when the gods grew greater and became more
removed from man, the necessity of continuing to pass on this gift to them gave rise to
sacrificial rites, intended to ensure that the objects thus spiritualized reached these
spiritual beings." (Introduction page 2)
The
authors then go on to show Tyler's theories of how, as "gods grew greater
and became more removed from man"(2 top) sacrificial rites were born. After painting this very orderly, concise
progression the authors go on to say there
may be some "historical basis of truth" (2 middle) in it and move
on.
Then, "their
simplicity, itself may stem from an insufficiency of documents" (6) and if
rife with usual implicit falsehoods
gained by combinations and labeling."(p2)
As I
say, texts relied upon are Biblical and Vedic.
The authors say Greek and Roman
sources, though newer are just "not of equal value". (p7)
First
they look at the sacrificial systems as a whole in their many ramifications and
establish what pervades all and render up a definition. Having done this they look for the "scheme"
(page 19).
The
scheme (all important moments included) breaks down into "the
entry"(p 19). "can only be
carried out in a religious atmosphere by essentially religious agents..."
(p 19 bottom)The cast includes:
·
the sacrifier(p20)
·
the sacrificer(22)
·
the place, the instruments(p25)
·
the victim(p28)
(can be human, animal, agricultural product, water, )
·
Action
"The
victim is first consecrated..." (p45)
The
procedure then goes on, and then the exit (p45)
Hubert & Mauss then state "The respective importance of these
phases... ...can vary infinitely
according to the circumstances."(p49)
Then they go on to show what these circumstances are.
They
discuss how the "General Functions can vary the scheme." (p50) This is also true of "special
functions".
The Sacrifice of the
God (p77)
Hubert
& Mauss give a myriad of examples in mythology of the victim being a god.
Conclusion, definitions
"...
establishes a means of communication between the sacred and the profane worlds
through mediation of a victim, that is something that in the course of the
ceremony is destroyed." (p97) "Moreover
we (Hubert & Mauss) have been able to see how many beliefs and social
practices not strictly religious are
liked to sacrifice... ...We have given
ourselves only to the task of attempting to put it (sacrifice) in its place."
Notes
pages
104 to 154 are notes
Again, "must read" for a student of sacrifice
Hubert & Mauss Sacrifice, it's Nature and Function
Essai sur la Nature et la Funtion du Sacrifice
Bob Hill
No comments:
Post a Comment