One of
the questions that constantly recycles is when is a death a sacrifice, a murder,
a martyrdom, an argument settled, an execution, others.
Two
authors who really pursue this question from different angles are Hyman
Maccoby, "The Sacred Executioner" and Miranda Green "Dying for
the Gods".
Maccoby ( example on page 100, second
paragraph, but runs throughout the book) not only recognizes disagreement, but
attempts to point out who disagrees and why.
He definitely takes the approach that most scriptures and other written
records of the last few thousand years have been redacted later to speak to the
then current readers. He tries very hard
to lead us through the underbrush with the advantages he has as a dedicated
scholar so that we can see that there may be material that can be read between
the lines.
Green has the advantage of being
"Head of the Research Centre the Study of Culture, Archeology, Religions,
and Biogeography at the University of Wales College (Now in 2013 merged with
University of South Wales, my note), Newport, where she holds a personal chair
in Archeology. In 2001, when "Dying
for the Gods" was published, she had written 12 books, including Exploring the World of the Druids. (Back Fly Leaf)
Green
makes no bones (there I go again) about how difficult it is to differentiate
with ancient remains to determine the nature of an apparent possible sacrifice
and opposed to executions, etc. Her
accompanying Illustrations are impressive/informative.
Both
authors stress that civilization is a very new phenomena in the millions of
years of human life. Both indicate that
Human sacrifices seemed to carry a certain magic quality about them that even
animal blood sacrifices do not have, except in the earliest sacrificial days
when the animal may more resemble the deity involved. It was after the Jewish concept of "man
made in our own image" gave human sacrifice any special meaning. Both authors jump into substitute deaths,
scape goats... "Founding
sacrifices"...
No comments:
Post a Comment